AI automation agency

Systems that run the work, not demos of it.

Most AI projects stop at a pilot that impresses a room and changes nothing. We build the version that runs on Monday: agents, workflow automation and custom LLM applications, wired into the stack you already pay for, measured against the numbers you had before we started.

Tell us the process. You get a scoped plan back, with a build shape and a timeline

How one of our systems is wired TRIGGERform, inbox, cron SOURCEcrm, docs, api AGENT plan, act, verify ACTIONwrite, send, file LEDGERlogged, reviewable
How it runs

Six stages, and you can stop after any of them

Nothing here requires a leap of faith. Each stage produces something you can look at and judge before the next one starts.

Stage 01 · Week 1

Frame

We map the process as it actually runs, not as the org chart says it runs. Every handoff, every exception, every place a human is copying between two screens.

Output: A written process map and the one workflow worth automating first
Stage 02 · Week 1 to 2

Instrument

Before anything is built we measure the current state: volume, cycle time, error rate, cost per run. Without this there is nothing to compare against later.

Output: A baseline you can hold the build to
Stage 03 · Week 2 to 8

Build

The system gets built in slices, each one shipped and used. You see working software early and often rather than a reveal at the end.

Output: A running system, in your stack, on your data
Stage 04 · Week 6 to 10

Prove

We run the system alongside the humans doing the work and compare against the baseline. If it is not better, it does not ship. That is the whole test.

Output: A comparison against the numbers from stage two
Stage 05 · Week 8 to 12

Hand over

Documentation, runbooks, an owner on your side who understands how it works, and the credentials in your name. No hostage situations.

Output: Your team able to run and change it without us
Stage 06 · Ongoing

Compound

Once one process is automated the next one is cheaper, because the plumbing already exists. This is where the return actually comes from.

Output: A second and third system at a fraction of the first cost
How we think

Six positions we actually hold

These are the ones that cost us work sometimes, which is how you know they are real rather than decoration.

01

We build engines, not experiments

A demo proves a model can do something once. An engine does it every day, at your volume, with the failures handled. Only one of those changes a P&L.

02

The baseline comes before the build

If nobody measured the process before it was automated, nobody can honestly say the automation worked. We measure first, every time, even when it delays the fun part.

03

You own everything

Code in your repository, keys in your accounts, documentation written for your team. If you fire us on a Friday the system still runs on Monday.

04

A human stays in the loop where it matters

Full autonomy is the right call for a tagging job and the wrong call for anything that touches money, hiring or a customer relationship. We put the review step where the risk is.

05

Small slices, shipped early

Long builds hide bad assumptions. Shipping a thin version in week two surfaces the problems while they are still cheap to fix.

06

We tell you when not to automate

Some processes are too rare, too variable, or too close to a judgement call. Automating those buys you a fragile system and a maintenance bill. We say so before you spend.

Stack

Boring where it counts

We pick the least exciting tool that does the job, because the interesting one is usually the one nobody can maintain in eighteen months. Models get swapped as they improve. The plumbing around them is built to outlast them.

PythonTypeScriptNodeOpenAIAnthropicLangGraphn8nTemporalPostgrespgvectorSupabaseCloudflare WorkersAWSPlaywrightTwilioHubSpotSlackNotionAirtableZapierdbtMetabase
FAQ

The questions that come up first

What does a first project usually look like?
One process, end to end, live in production. Not a platform, not a roadmap. We pick the workflow with the clearest volume and the least ambiguity, ship it, and measure it against the baseline we took before starting. That gives you a real result to judge us on before you commit to anything larger.
How is this different from buying an AI tool?
A tool is generic by design, because it has to work for thousands of companies. It handles the eighty percent of your process that looks like everyone else's and leaves the twenty percent that is actually yours. We build for that twenty percent, and we integrate with the tools you already pay for rather than replacing them.
Do we need clean data before we start?
No, and waiting for clean data is how automation projects die. Most processes worth automating run on messy data today and humans are absorbing the mess. We design for the mess, surface what cannot be resolved automatically, and route those cases to a person.
What if the system gets something wrong?
It will, the same way a person does. The question is whether you find out. Every system we build logs its decisions in a form a non-engineer can read, flags low-confidence cases for review instead of guessing, and can be rolled back. That is the difference between an automation you can trust and one you quietly stop using.
Who owns the code and the accounts?
You do, all of it. Code in your repository, API keys in your accounts, documentation written for your team rather than for us. We would rather be kept because the work is good than because leaving is painful.
How do you price this?
Fixed scope for the first build so you are not signing a blank cheque on a process nobody has automated before, then a monthly arrangement if you want us running and extending it. Email the process you want automated and you get a scoped number back.

Send us the process that is eating the most hours.

Not a brief, not a deck. Just describe what happens today, who does it, and roughly how often. A scoped plan comes back with the build shape, the stack and a timeline.

Start a project